The Judiciary: Independence & Activism
Examine the integrated judicial system, the evolution of the collegium system for appointments, and the fine line between judicial review and judicial overreach.
Learning Objectives
- •Analyze the evolution and controversies surrounding the Collegium system
- •Distinguish between Original, Appellate, and Advisory jurisdictions
- •Evaluate the merits and demerits of Judicial Activism
Detailed Analysis
" 'Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has democratized access to justice but has also blurred the lines of separation of powers.' Critically comment. "
1. Introduction: Define PIL (originated in USA, introduced in India by Justices VR Krishna Iyer and PN Bhagwati). 2. Body-Positives (Democratization): Relaxation of 'locus standi', protecting environmental/human rights (e.g., Bandhua Mukti Morcha, MC Mehta cases). 3. Body-Negatives (Separation of Powers): Discuss Judicial Overreach—courts directing executive policy on areas they lack expertise (e.g., banning liquor near highways, BS-VI norms). 4. Conclusion: Highlight the need for judicial restraint. The judiciary must act as an alarm bell, not act as the government itself.
Key Concepts
Basic Structure Doctrine
Judicial independence is a core part of the Basic Structure, which is why the executive-heavy NJAC was deemed unconstitutional.
Terminology
Historical Insight
Epistolary Jurisdiction
In the early days of PIL, the SC treated letters and telegrams addressed to judges directly as writ petitions.
Quick Check
What is the composition of the SC Collegium?
Under which article does the SC exercise Advisory Jurisdiction?