Historical Background & Making of the Constitution
Understand the evolutionary nature of the Indian Constitution, tracing its roots from British colonial acts to the rigorous debates of the Constituent Assembly.
Learning Objectives
- •Analyze the shift from centralisation (1773-1833) to decentralisation (1861-1935) under British rule
- •Evaluate the structural continuity between the GoI Act 1935 and the Indian Constitution
- •Understand the consensus-based approach of the Constituent Assembly
Detailed Analysis
" 'The Indian Constitution is often criticized as a mere carbon copy of the Government of India Act, 1935.' Critically analyze this statement. "
1. Introduction: Acknowledge that structurally (federal scheme, judiciary, emergency powers), the Constitution draws heavily from the 1935 Act. 2. Body Paragraph 1 (What's different philosophically): Explain that the 1935 Act lacked a Preamble, Fundamental Rights, and DPSP, which form the 'conscience' of the 1950 Constitution. 3. Body Paragraph 2 (Democratic ethos): The 1935 Act was an imposed colonial law with limited franchise; the Constitution is rooted in popular sovereignty (Universal Adult Franchise). 4. Conclusion: It is not a blind copy, but a pragmatic adaptation of a known administrative machinery, infused with democratic and rights-based philosophy.
Key Concepts
Politics of Accommodation
Granville Austin noted that the Constituent Assembly resolved highly contentious issues (like language and federal structure) through compromise and consensus rather than voting.
Terminology
Historical Insight
Borrowed Features
While the framework is from the GoI Act 1935, FRs are inspired by the US Bill of Rights, and DPSPs by the Irish Constitution.
Quick Check
Which Act introduced Dyarchy in the provinces?
What was the main difference between the GoI Act 1935 and the final Constitution regarding citizens' rights?